<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for EveryCity Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.everycity.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.everycity.co.uk</link>
	<description>News, Tips &#38; Information for Developers and Agencies</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Making servers faster: RAID 1 vs RAID 5 performance differences by admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.everycity.co.uk/2008/10/07/making-servers-faster-raid-1-vs-raid-5-performance-differences/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.everycity.co.uk/?p=37#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Netgear have a pretty good selection of NAS devices which support from 2 to a number of drives.

In terms of video edit data the RAID level you use won't have much impact on performance.

For redundancy RAID5 with 3 drives can be superior to RAID1 with 2 drives, but it depends how you set it up.  Ideally if you're really worried you would take a backup onto a separate drive or onto a DVD/Tape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netgear have a pretty good selection of NAS devices which support from 2 to a number of drives.</p>
<p>In terms of video edit data the RAID level you use won&#8217;t have much impact on performance.</p>
<p>For redundancy RAID5 with 3 drives can be superior to RAID1 with 2 drives, but it depends how you set it up.  Ideally if you&#8217;re really worried you would take a backup onto a separate drive or onto a DVD/Tape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Making servers faster: RAID 1 vs RAID 5 performance differences by Mark</title>
		<link>http://blog.everycity.co.uk/2008/10/07/making-servers-faster-raid-1-vs-raid-5-performance-differences/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.everycity.co.uk/?p=37#comment-300</guid>
		<description>Hello,
We are working with video editing and as you know the raw video is take all the available spaces,
We need the best storage system to use it as storage and share NAS drive with the best configuration to keep the data protected and ultra fast.

what you suggest for us?

I read Raid 5 is good but, I don't know about Raid 0+1 and 6 and 10 and other raid systems.
what is the fast without losing a lot of spaces?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,<br />
We are working with video editing and as you know the raw video is take all the available spaces,<br />
We need the best storage system to use it as storage and share NAS drive with the best configuration to keep the data protected and ultra fast.</p>
<p>what you suggest for us?</p>
<p>I read Raid 5 is good but, I don&#8217;t know about Raid 0+1 and 6 and 10 and other raid systems.<br />
what is the fast without losing a lot of spaces?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
