<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making servers faster: RAID 1 vs RAID 5 performance differences</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.everycity.co.uk/2008/10/07/making-servers-faster-raid-1-vs-raid-5-performance-differences/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.everycity.co.uk/2008/10/07/making-servers-faster-raid-1-vs-raid-5-performance-differences/</link>
	<description>News, Tips &#38; Information for Developers and Agencies</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 05:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Slater</title>
		<link>http://blog.everycity.co.uk/2008/10/07/making-servers-faster-raid-1-vs-raid-5-performance-differences/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 11:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.everycity.co.uk/?p=37#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Re. RAID levels. RAID 10 speeds up both reads and writes unlike RAID 5 which is a bit slower on writes due to the parity calculation (although it speeds reads). The more disks you have in array, the more chance of 2 disks failing at the same time. RAID 6 protects against this and gives about 88% of raw capacity. RAID 6 is similar to RAID 5 in terms of performance and is good for data warehousing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. RAID levels. RAID 10 speeds up both reads and writes unlike RAID 5 which is a bit slower on writes due to the parity calculation (although it speeds reads). The more disks you have in array, the more chance of 2 disks failing at the same time. RAID 6 protects against this and gives about 88% of raw capacity. RAID 6 is similar to RAID 5 in terms of performance and is good for data warehousing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.everycity.co.uk/2008/10/07/making-servers-faster-raid-1-vs-raid-5-performance-differences/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.everycity.co.uk/?p=37#comment-302</guid>
		<description>Netgear have a pretty good selection of NAS devices which support from 2 to a number of drives.

In terms of video edit data the RAID level you use won't have much impact on performance.

For redundancy RAID5 with 3 drives can be superior to RAID1 with 2 drives, but it depends how you set it up.  Ideally if you're really worried you would take a backup onto a separate drive or onto a DVD/Tape.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Netgear have a pretty good selection of NAS devices which support from 2 to a number of drives.</p>
<p>In terms of video edit data the RAID level you use won&#8217;t have much impact on performance.</p>
<p>For redundancy RAID5 with 3 drives can be superior to RAID1 with 2 drives, but it depends how you set it up.  Ideally if you&#8217;re really worried you would take a backup onto a separate drive or onto a DVD/Tape.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

